Yet another conference for those info pros

A new conference in Prague called INFORUM for information specialists from public and special libraries, corporate sector and government agencies. Read this presentation extracted from the website:

“The 13th annual conference of INFORUM that deals with professional electronic information resources for research, development, education and business purposes will be held from May 22 to May 24, 2007 in Prague”.

Both Peter Jacsó, Phil Bradley and Guus van den Brekel are guest speakers. Never heard Peter Jacsó but would be delighted to hear him. Though I’m not going there. Read a lot of Peter Jacsós articles. Guus I heard and met in Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Colis 6 – a conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science held in Borås next year

Just discovered a Library and Information Science (LIS) conference called COLIS 6 – Sixth International conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science with theme title: “Featuring the Future”. It will take place in Borås, Sweden, in August 13-16, 2007. The conference themes are Reframing LIS from Different Perspectives, LIS in Contemporary Society, LIS versus New Research and Professional Fields
and New Research Methods in LIS.

Session “Open document formats” at Internetdagarna, Sthlm, 2006

At the session “Öppna dokumentformat (eng. open documents formats)” [PDF] 13.40 Tuesday 24 October Predrag Mitrovic from Microsoft talked about “Open document formats adds value” and the standard Open XML which Microsoft created and wants ISO certified as open office ODF. Predrag meant that the market will decide which format to support. He thought that open XML formats is the future. Nice to hear from a MS guy. But this doesn’t necessarily means open office will be more used than MS.

16 May 2006 Matt Mondok at M-dollar wrote that Gartner Analysts predicts that the ISO certifiaction of ODF lower’s openXML hopes for certification. He also says:

“Nevertheless, ODF’s standardization doesn’t mean less Microsoft Office customers. Earlier this month, the OpenDocument Foundation, Inc. released the ODF Plugin for Microsoft Office. The ODF Plugin has been seen by many as an advantage to Microsoft because companies can still use Microsoft Office while leveraging the ODF format”.

By the way, Predrag looks like a mix of Tommy Körberg and Gerard Depardieu;-)

At last Predrag mentioned this developer website: openxmldeveloper.org.

Jonas Öberg from Freesoftware foundation had a talk with the title: “Esperanto för datorer (eng. Esperanto for computers)” [PDF].

It demands a very strong will to make open standards to work! We must reduce the economic incitements for private participants. Jonas encouraged users to not use software that don’t implement use of open formats.

A format is about how something is stored and transfered. If we know how the format looks like we can read the information and take part in the communication. A standard is an agreement between several parts to use the same format and that increases the value of the format and allows exchange between different systems.

Format focuses on data and information and standard on systems to work together. Open formats or standards can’t permit patents to limit dissemination. Anyone should be able to copy, distribute and use the format specification without cost.

Standards should be established and maintained of an organisation that permits all interested parts to participate in an open process of decisions. As customers we must demand for open standards and formats.

Karl Wessbrandt from Verva [PDF] also talked about open documents within the authorities

Opening session “The vision gets real” at Internetdagarna, Stockholm, 2006

I’m sitting here listening at the opening session “Visionen blir verklighet (eng. The vision gets real)” at the Internetdagarna (eng. Internet days) in Stockholm, 24th October 2006. Håkan Eriksson, research director and CTO at Ericsson, is talking about the three screens: plasma screen, laptop and cellphone. When you’re sitting in your sofa you want the plasma screen, when you want to work on the desktop you use your laptop and when you’re on the run you always have your cellphone in your pocket. Then it’s important to be able to move or reach data from all three screens. Further he talked about techniques behind.

Instead of Jonas Persson (he was sick) Predrag Mitrovic, CTO Microsoft Sverige, was talking. Quite new in the MS corporation, started his employment at the beginning of this year. Good speaker. Interesting content? Yes, some of it. He talked about different divisions. Their plattform services division is the solid ground. On this division they have to productivity arms: the business division for information workers and their Entertainment and devices division for digital lifestyle. Microsoft has three research labs at the US east coast, one in Cambridge, UK, and one in Bangalore and one in Peking. 7 billions USD are financing Research and Development for more than 700 employees. Predrag says MS want to develop interfaces for the whole family with broad user base and good support for 10 years forward. MS want to have search engine Windows Live as a central hub and build a services-based concept around it. Some of the big challenges he said was security (and integrity). Not strange for a MS guy to focus on that big problem for windows users (my comment when I’m blogging via my Linux OS ;-)

Predrag also talked about more relevancy when searching. Not a new issue indeed. He meant you should be able to search fast with your cell phone and get fast delivery. We need more natural interfaces and that’s why MS spend lot of money on R&D.

Geoff Huston, Chief scientist APNIC in Australia, was the third talker. Here is a short description of APNIC:

APNIC is one of five Regional Internet Registries currently operating in the world. It provides allocation and registration services which support the operation of the Internet globally. It is a not-for-profit, membership-based organisation whose members include Internet Service Providers, National Internet Registries, and similar organisations. APNIC represents the Asia Pacific region, comprising 56 economies.

Because I’m in hurry I just blog som sentences and power point notes from his speech about network and IP’s:

– What is happeing here seems happening everywhere.
– Is “convergence” still a valid concept? Bringing alltogether in a single network really a solution.
– Bittorrent has taken over the whole network!
– Overlay-based services now oen the user.
– Who really owns the user? Google, Ebay etc does.
– Forget about adding value in the network.
– The unconverged internet is vibrant etc.

All talks will be podcasted and published on the website if I’m right understood.

Buset and Kvale on increasing information literacy

Information literacy has been a buzzword in the library world for a while now. One thing to increase information literacy has been to produce if I translate it directly from swedish: search guides or search guidelines.

Karen Buset and Sigvor Kvale, from Norweigan University of Science and Technology (NTNU), has produced an e-learning tool similar to search guidelines called VIKO. Maybe a bit broader because it includes also academic writing guidelines. The title of their talk was: “Increasing information literacy at NTNU and St.Olavs hospital – Implementation of an e-learning tool”, presented at the Parallel Session II , Thursday, 14 Sept, 14.00 – 15.30, at the EAHIL conference in Cluj-Napoca 2006.

NTNU in Trondheim is the second largest university in Norway with 20.000 students. In contrary to many other search guidelines NTNU has put a lot of effort in the integration of the guide into the user education at NTNU library. Like distributing promotional material to all branch libraries, demonstration of VIKO to all reference and subject librarians, trying to find key persons at the institutions to get it implemented at variuos programs, help teachers linkt to VIKO from their courses hompages, integrate it at the regulary library training classes and courses at the hospital deparments.

VIKO has improved student papers and the use of VIKO has also increased, said Buset and Kvale. Students and teachers has confirmed that VIKO is useful and meets the users needs and is a product that meets an important demand that can enhance collaboration between library and academic staff.

They have planned an evaluation survey in 2007 and they have also planned an update of VIKO. Will be interesting to see that evaluation. In many swedish research libraries it exists search guides and Else Nygren did an evaluation of them as BIBSAM project 2004: Evaluation of search guidelines [PDF]. The result was depressing. Users preferred trial-and-error instead of help texts. The best search guide in Sweden is the guide produced bu Blekinge Technical University: The big search guide – an interactive course on how to search, assess and treat information.

As a nitpicking librarian I checked that part in VIKO about searching the Internet. As Buset and Kvale said they have tried to write in a manner that won’t make the information out of date that fast. I agree they’ve done it quite good in the Internet search part. Though when calling Scirus a scientific search engine they should compare it with Google Scholar and Window Live Academic. They all have different approaches but call them selves all scientific. But I know search guides must be brief. Though I believe more in interactive search guidelines than text-based, when it comes to search in different interfaces at least.

But why doing all these guidelines at every university? Why don’t cooperate all libraries and make translations and adjustments for local needs instead?

Now I see that all power point presentations has been put up on EAHIL conference web site. Thanks for that!

Guus from Netherlands on the importance of being user-focused

When I saw the title of Guus van den Brekels speech I thought this guy must be on the same line as I. The title was: Into the user enviroment now!: How the users have changed and how the libraries can adjust, presented 9.30 Friday 15 September at Plenary Session III at the Eahil conference in Cluj-Napoca, 2006.

And sure he was. I’ve been around Sweden and Norway talking about the effects of the Googlification and the new user behaviors. I also had a column in swedish mag Internetworld with title (title translated to english): The challenger of Google is there in your municipality. Guus had some solutions on this, so let’s hear.

Guus described the new user as a person who is fascinated by new technolgies, want to be interactive (not isolated), no tolerance of delay, want to stay connected, learning by doing and not by being told, trial-and-error approach, actions more important than knowledge, multitasking as a way of life.

A really good summary of the new user as I see it.
-Students say: Why do I need the OPAC, Google gives me enough, meant Guus.
-We have to know that we’re not the only one for the user. The user demands more today. People like web 2.0 services so we have to keep up with what they’re doing, meant Guus.

So what to do Guus?

On short term he meant we have to use web 2.0 social software, open standards and protocols, evaluate log file statistics, modular web-based library services etc

He suggested LiveTrix instead (if I understood LiveTrix functions right?) of proprietary library portal Metalib to metasearch several sources.

Guus had 10 top technologies for the library to embrace:Weblogs, RSS, Wikis, Instant Messaging, Podcasting, Open source software, SMS, Social software, User-created content, Mashing-up services.

In the end he showed us the QuickSearch Library Toolbar. Search toolbars have been common for a while now and a lot of users know about them as I experienced it. Guus and his library in Groningen, Netherlands, has made their own toolbar that gives the user fast access to a lot of sources from the library. Just install that toolbar into your webbrowser. The QuickSearch toolbar is built upon Conduit toolbar. The toolbar he showed the audience made a lot of them very interested.

-My boss doesn’t like when I say problems, he calls it challenges, said Guus.
I had a two minutes chat with him afterwards and asked him if it’s not better with Firefox extensions and their embedded serch toolbar where you can add your self-built search engine?

– You should use all options if the medical students like it, not just toolbars. Younger students like things like this and I think even older users will discover web 2.0 services, said Guus diplomatic.

Nice talk! I read in his e-mail afterwards when sending us the link to the power point that he already got some offerings on doing more talks in different places. Good luck! Spread your thoughts in the library world.

Read also Guus blog Digicmb. Here’s an interview with Guus by Oliver Obst.

IFLA Health and Biosciences Section Satellite Session Durban 2007 open for Call for Papers

The other day I got a call for papers announcement via Eahil mailing list from the IFLA conference in Durban, South Africa, August 19-23 2007. It’s a satellite session held by the Health and biosciences section of IFLA. They are specially interested in talks concerning:

– the information professionals role in responding to natural disasters and new diseases
– case studies in responses to both disasters e.g. Hurricane Katrina and emerging or re-emerging diseases e.g bird flu
– exisiting programs to address these issues

The talks will be 15-20 including a Q&A session. I don’t disagree to short talks but this short including Q:s? Isn’t that a bit to brief even in a time of information overload?

Summary of EAHIL in Cluj and farewell

Well, it’s not an easy task to summarize such a splendid conference without missing someone or something and though not boring you with an Oscar Award-speech of thanks.

I must thank you everyone who I talked to less or more or who rather came to talk with me. I hope even you who didn’t agree with my opinions in my talks or how I present them would talk to me because I think different opinions and discussion among different librarians are healthy in our field.

My main aim in this profession has always been to lift up the importance of our professional role and to extend the cooperation and exchange in the library world and specially among medical libraries. Of course in the end I hope it will promote our health care worlwide. That’s why I think it was something extra to come to Romania.

One example, as I said when I got a question, is that some people who never knew me before (a greek professor of surgery at my hospital once did) asks me if I’m a computer engineer or something like that? I don’t get irritated of that, but I think it says something of the view of the librarian profession. That’s why I really try to establish: No, I’m a librarian and it’s possible to be very computer literate and male if you’re librarian.

Well, the Gala Dinner was tremendous and as some of you may recognized I even liked to dance as many of you did. I even met more colleagues at the Gala. Some of you who planned this conference, Sally and Iona, I hadn’t so much time or occasions to talk with but I thank you for the great work you’ve done.

Even though the WLAN didn’t work properly all the time I think it didn’t disturb me that much as a laptopblogger. Though I had a cable connection at my hotel which worked splendid all the time. Thanks hotel Agape!

My only real complaint is the one of putting up power point slides on the conference website. It’s a nightmare for a blogging conference visitor if you don’t get the slides fast. Instead you must take time to ask the speaker to put them up or send them to you and if you want to blog the talk during the conference and not when you get back at work or even later it’s not satisfying. I rather do my documentation when the talk is still fresh in my head and not three weeks later. I often here from colleagues if the slides isn’t published within a day or to they don’t get back looking. Much of our findings presented on our conferences are “freshware”, that’s why it’s important to put it up in time also.

Now I read on Guus (conference speaker from Netherlands, nice meeting you) blog he suggests EAHIL to start a blog and Open Access repository for all publications, presentations, posters etc. I’m the first to sign his petition.

Well, I don’t think this will be my last time at the EAHIL conferences and of course it depends on my employer’s willingness to send me. Thanks, Umeå University Library for lettting me go there! And thanks my boss Ingrid for your care in that little aeroplane from Buda to Cluj. You know I’m afraid of flying, though I’m nearly cured nowadays.

At last to the audience at my talk on interfaces. It wasn’t my first time travelling outside nordic countries, but talking ;-) outside nordic countries. And I will try not to twist that laser eye to much at next talk.

And at really last: I hope to meet you all sometime in future at future conferences: Filip, Herve, Christina, Ingela, Katja, Artemis, Patrice, Ann, Tiina, Oliver, Guus, David, Michael, Henrik, Birgitta, Marie, Eva, Thomas, Donna, Tuulevi, you Moldavians, Arne, Benoit, retired lady from Manchester, Cambridge librarian who helped the Moldavians come to the conference etc.

On career development for librarians

Tuulevi Ovaska, library course director chief medical librarian of medical library at Kuopio University Library, talked about Possibilities of horizontal career development and changing roles of librarians afternoon 15 September at EAHIL conference in Cluj.

Are really librarians in control of the changes with in their profession?, she asked. She mentioned three types of career developments(CD): task rotation, job exchange and international mobility to improve horizontal CD. Instead of getting vertical career from staff to supervisor or head of library you should be able to develop horizontal on the staff level.

Examples are to rotate in the library or change tasks or change to other libraries, maybe also go abroad. CD requires creativity and interest, but some people just like daily routine work. Kuopio made a survey to find out the attitudes of staff members and the management of Kuopio University Library. General attitude to task rotation showed 68% were interested in it.

But all CD changes needs leadership management and support, says Tuulevi, and organization culture is not easy to change. There was a potential in Kuopio for internal task rotation in the libraries from 3 to 6 months and internal exchange for short periods less than 3 month. Though, the libraries and their management must stay in charge of the changes in our profession.

A question from the audience claiming this was a survey but have Kuopio implemented this CD possibilities in Kuopio library?

– Just in small scale some implementation in our library has been done, says Tuulevi. It’s up to the supervisors to take the opportunity, its starting but it’s going slow. Three librarians has changed job in the library.