Leksikon.org discussed in Denmark

Jack Andersen, lecturer at Danmarks biblioteksskole, discussed in his blog in April this year the Danish free webencyclopedia Leksikon.org, on the grounds of an article published in Weekendavisen March 19-27 this year [PDF].

According to the article and Danish Wikipedia the encyclopedia is left-minded and was established by left wing parties Enhedslisten and Venstresocialisterne. They call their encyclopedia for The encyclopedia for the 21th century and explain their motives sincerely on their website: Can we trust the Internet?.

“It’s always the winners that write the history. That’s why encyclopedias nearly always are published by well-established publishers. Now where doing an exception! The encyclopedia for the 21th century is an alternative Danish encyclopedia which a bigger circuit of authors been updating since 1998″.

Jack is critizing the WA article because it seems they are assuming that encyclopedias are neutral. This is what leksikon.org says about being neutral.

“The encyclopedia is not neutral, because the neutral is not existing. Instead we try to present varoius bids and interpretations of the ideas explained. The reader doesn’t get an explanation but several. In that way it’s not dogmatic and for that reason our motto is; be in doubt of everything”.

Jack says in his blog again:

“It’s important to put the search engines, the encyclopedias and databases and their cultural context in the public eye”.

Also read the Jack Andersen column in Berlingske Tidene 26 August 2007 with title: Can we trust the Internet? Or use Google Translate for an english translation.

Leksikon.org has taken inspiration from the Norwegian encyclopedia Pax Leksikon.

Springer sponsoring reference manager website CiteULike

Just read that Springer is sponsoring online reference manager CiteULike and no one could be happier than me. I’ve used CiteULike since sometime in the beginning and though we have online reference managers like EndnoteWeb and Connotea I’m still a frequentley user of CiteULike. Yes, I use Endnote as a client sometimes but I like storing my things on the web and EndNote Web still haven’t made me happy.

I had some trouble with BibTex import this spring and I tried to find a contact e-mail address and it was totally impossible. I found an address at last in my e-mail history, because a couple of years ago I had a support mail issue I got a fast answer to from the founder. No, I did not get an answer this spring and I have been worried the last half year what would happen to CiteULike?

That’s why I’m very happen to see Springer sponsoring CiteULike. So, what do I expect from this partnership:

I want an answer to why I can’t import BibTex?

I want more support of importing references from publishers like Wiley.

And if I can be a bit visionary I want CiteULike to get all this kind of features Zotero has like storing screen shots and so on. Zotero is not an anvanced reference manager like CiteULike.

I also want it to be possible to import and store social bookmarking links from Del.icio.us and have a an update function from Del.icio.us to CiteULike. Like Nsyght does with Del.icio.us.

And think if it would be possible to export (send) selected references from CiteULike to an open format for students books lists and get them verified by a local OPAC or database or Library of Congress catalogue to get them published on university courses websites.

Could you fix this Springer by the end of the next quarter, please! ;-)

Hotting up an Intranet with microblogging

We have a quite boring Intranet at my work, but some of it suits our internal need like storing policy documents, phone numbers, booking conference rooms and so on. But it’s not IMO hot in any perspective and yes, it doesn’t have to be that but a little bit more maybe would make colleagues use it a bit more. I’ve been a blogger since 2001 and yes, I’m quite active in social networks. It took me sometime before I dared to use Twitter (microblogging) to tell what I’m doing at the moment (How narcissistic ain’t it?). I switched directly to Jaiku because Erik Stattin had and if he did it must be important to do that ;-)

Today I’m glad I did move in time (before Google bought Jaiku and shut down new registrations). Thanks, Erik! Afterwards, I’ve understood the power of blogposting within 140 characters limit. Though the comments has no limit as I know (if I would prefer that also).

I would compare Jaiku with a mix of blogging and “open” chatting or discussion groups. Everyone can read the messages like on blogs but the microformat of it makes it look more like chatting or maybe a discussion group. But it has also adopted the way of diary blogs work. If you don’t know what to write you just tell the world what your doing like:”I’m writing a blog post about microblogging“. Someone reads and maybe asks what blog you mean and sometimes it leads to some knowledge sharing.

My idea since a couple of months is to use microblogging on an Intranet. I know maybe my colleagues which some of them still are sceptical about the meaning of blogging and social networks like Facebook will ask:”What’s the meaning of telling others what you doing?”.

Well, in my library many people work in their own office with no direct contact to most of their colleagues. How to still have a bit of knowledge sharing and work socializing? You can never understimate the power of an open-plan office where several employees sit together in a more open space. Hearing with one ear what’s going on or others do. Okay, it also depends on what type of work you’re doing. Microblogging is an easy oppurtunity and not so time-consuming way of meeting colleagues virtually and knowing what they’re doing.

I often hear the question:”I wonder what xx is doing? xx is on meetings and conferences and I nearly ever meet xx because I’m sitting here and xx is sitting there”. Okay, we have phone, we have email, we have chat, but what about microblogging? It can start by telling colleagues what you’re doing and then maybe you get comments about that and you’re starting knowledge sharing. Here’s a faked example of microblogging:

“Cataloging medieval books from Russia.”

Comment:”Oh, what books are that?”

Comment:”Oh, it’s a donation from xxx professor in Russian language. Didn’t you hear about that at our xx meeting?”

Comment:”Maybe I slept. But do you understand russia”.

Comment:”Yes, quite good at least. I lived there for two years when my husband had his post-doc”.

Comment:”Oh, maybe you can help me translate that great article about librarianship I found. It was of course in Russia”.

Comment:”Well, send it over”.

That’s my example. Fredrik Stenbeck writes in his swedish blog about microblogging and “personal flows”:

“Mail och chat är två kommunikationsmedel som båda har sina bra syften, men i ett företag förblir ofta dessa konversationer låsta till de deltagare som är inblandade. Med Personliga Flöden blir alla konversationer sökbara och tillgängliga för alla i företaget vilket verkligen gagnar värdet på det intellektuella kapitalet. Vidare är detta media ett ypperligt ställa att identifiera expertis”.

A try to a translation: “Mail and chat have their purposes but often these ways to communicate get locked to just participants involved. With “personal flows” all conversations are possible to search and available for all within the comapny which in return gives a value of the intellectual capital. This media is an excellent place to identify expertise”.

Well, my question to readers are? Do you know anyone using microblogging tools for internal communication like at a Intranet? Do you know any open source client software for microblogging? (No, I haven’t googled for that software more than not finding Drupal modules for microblogging).

Free book covers from LibraryThing

Via Betabib I found out that we now have yet another book cover service alternative to Amazon coming right from fabulous LibraryThing. They say they have one million book covers uploaded by users, but only 913,000 covers are accessible, the others being non-ISBN covers. These are the restrictions:

“You also agree to some very limited terms:

  • You do not make LibraryThing cover images available to others in bulk. But you may cache bulk quantities of covers.
  • Use does not involve or promote a LibraryThing competitor.
  • If covers are fetched through an automatic process (eg., not by people hitting a web page), you may not fetch more than one cover per second”.

But compared to the Amazon book cover service you don’t need to link back to LibraryThing. More about the cover offerings at the LibraryThing blog.

Paid Links beggers

Every now and then I get lovely offerings by mail. This is my latest one:

“Hi,

We’ve seen your website at http://www.ub.umu.se/eng_infosok/eng_ebooks.htm
and we love it!

We see that your traffic rank is 12889
and your link popularity is 67.
Also, you have been online since <Online since>.

With that kind of traffic, we will pay you up to $4,800/month
to advertise our links on your website.

Sincerely,

Jeroen Segerink
The ContactThem Network”

Selling paid links from web pages at my university??!! That would be a business, wouldn’t it? They’ve made their traffic analyze from Alexa and as I blogged about before, that statistics from Alexa isn’t the most accurate. Hey guys, I don’t want to loose public employment and don’t you know I’m very afraid of Matt Cutts.